|
|
|
|
|
|
PromoteDignity.Org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In John Stuart Mills' Utilitarianism, an unmistakably moral term is left
unreduced in the analysis of ethics. Though he concludes that the best
action is that which produces the greatest pleasure for the greatest
number, his comfort with this conclusion rests firmly in the notion of
dignity.
It is this fact of human dignity that makes something
like a hedonic calculus remotely ethical at all.
Supposition 1-Basic Goodness
What makes a particular pleasure greater than another is the degree to
which it coheres with the pleased's sense of inherent dignity, i.e., one's basic
sense of worth as a human person. It is from this sense of worth qua person,
that the dignified are compelled to treat others with that same dignity deserved by all
persons.
Supposition 2: The Problem of Evil
Though Mill argued that the fact of dignity was the preventative force that ensured
that people would not take pleasure in that which was beneath them, the facts of
history reveal that humans can take pleasure in acts quite different than the humane.
Supposition 3: Suggested Cause
That people take comfort, satisfaction, and pleasure in, or at the expense
of, the unnecessary suffering or degradation of another does not bespeak their wickedness.
It reveals the defecit of a need to understand self in relation to basic goodness
rather than pleasure or power. Pleasure is a decent guide; power a noble servant;
each makes a horrible master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|